Season 1
Terraforming the Real World
Season 1 examines how the physical world is being actively re-engineered — across energy, compute, materials, food, cities, and capital — and where current approaches are structurally misaligned with reality.
The focus is not innovation theatre, but constraint: what limits systems, what breaks at scale, and what trade-offs are being ignored.
Season 1 establishes the physical grammar of the future — the hard constraints that shape what can be built before politics, ideology, or preference enter the room.
Season 1 is designed to be listened to in sequence.
-
Core question
Why do our biggest ambitions — AI, climate transition, housing, industrial renewal — keep failing when they meet the real world?
And what happens when energy, land, materials, food, compute, and capital are treated not as sectors, but as one coupled physical system?Key threads
• The collapse of “weightless” economic narratives into physical constraints
• Energy, land, materials, food, and compute as a single integrated system
• Why land and infrastructure quietly determine what can scale — and what cannot
• The return of permanence, friction, and time as dominant forcesReal estate lens
Real estate as the balance sheet of civilisation — where abstract ambitions are forced to reconcile with physics, geography, and consent.
Land and buildings are not passive backdrops.
They are constraint containers where power, risk, and responsibility accumulate.Series structure
Season 1 unfolds in three phases:
• Phase 1 — The Physics of Power
Hard constraints that do not negotiate• Phase 2 — Systems Collision
Where digital ambition meets physical reality• Phase 3 — The Governance of Atoms
Who decides what happens when constraints biteSeries tie-back
This season establishes the core premise of Building Our Future:
real estate is not a sector — it is the spatial expression of civilisation-scale systems.Everything else flows from that.
PHASE 1 — THE PHYSICS OF POWER
Where energy, materials, and land impose hard constraints on what can be built.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
The world is re-encountering hard physical constraints — energy, materials, land, and time — and real estate is where those constraints collide.
Key threads
• Why “weightless” digital narratives collapse back into physical systems
• Energy, materials, food, and compute as co-dependent, not separate transitions
• Why long-duration assets matter again in a volatile world
Real estate lens
Land and buildings as constraint containers, not passive backdrops.
Series tie-back
This episode establishes the grammar of the season: real estate is not a sector — it is the spatial expression of civilisation-scale systems.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Energy availability, not planning policy, is increasingly the true determinant of land value.
Key threads
• Why power scarcity re-prices geography
• Grid access vs generation — and why they are not the same
• The myth of “energy abundance” in land-use decisions
Real estate lens
Grid adjacency as the new zoning.
Series tie-back
Energy is the first force that re-terraforms land — everything else is downstream.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Some infrastructure is too large, too slow, and too politically charged to avoid land-use conflict.
Key threads
• SMRs and “energy parks” as spatial propositions
• Consent, exclusion zones, and host-community economics
• Why nationally significant infrastructure exposes planning limits
Real estate lens
Nuclear as a land and consent problem, not an energy debate.
Series tie-back
Terraforming requires assets that permanently reshape land — and force political choices.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Technical solutions often fail not because the engineering is wrong, but because the social and legal friction is rational, organised, and powerful.
Key threads > • Why "NIMBYism" is a lazy label for complex local risk management
• The legal levers that stop "Serious Infrastructure" in its tracks
• Why a 100-year project often lacks a 100-year community benefit
Real estate lens
Consent as a non-negotiable planning constraint, not a PR hurdle.
Series tie-back
Season 1 shows what must be built; this episode reveals why it often isn't.
PHASE 2 — SYSTEMS COLLISION
Where institutions decide which constraints are overridden — and which futures are blocked.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
AI and compute are physical infrastructure, with extreme spatial and energy demands.
Key threads
• Data centres as the new ports or refineries
• Power density, cooling, and site selection
• Why “cloud” is a misleading metaphor
Real estate lens
Compute-grade land as a new asset class.
Series tie-back
The digital future still consumes land, steel, and electrons — at scale.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
The electricity network is quietly becoming the hidden planner of development.
Key threads
• Grid queues and stranded land
• Why “shovel-ready” often means “power-blind”
• The mismatch between local plans and national infrastructure
Real estate lens
Land without power is not development land — it is theoretical land.
Series tie-back
Terraforming fails when invisible systems are not surfaced.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Buildings are fundamentally chemical and material systems, not just designs.
Key threads
• Why materials breakthroughs stall at scale
• Cement, steel, and membranes as carbon and cost drivers
• Retrofit vs rebuild once material constraints bite
Real estate lens
Buildings as material stockpiles with long lifespans.
Series tie-back
Terraforming is constrained by chemistry, not imagination.
PHASE 3 — THE GOVERNANCE OF ATOMS
Where systems collide, trade-offs become explicit, and resilience replaces efficiency.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Innovation repeatedly fails at the point where it needs land, utilities, and finance.
Key threads
• The lab → pilot → factory → site gap
• Planning and power as scaling bottlenecks
• Why Britain lacks mid-scale industrial real estate
Real estate lens
The missing asset class between science parks and sheds.
Series tie-back
Terraforming requires spatial pathways for ideas to become infrastructure.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Land is being pulled in three directions — food, energy, and nature — and cannot optimise for all.
Key threads
• Land-use efficiency across food systems
• Energy intensity vs yield narratives
• The limits of vertical and controlled-environment agriculture
Real estate lens
Land as biological and energy infrastructure, not just acreage.
Series tie-back
Terraforming forces trade-offs — food systems make them unavoidable.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Cities increasingly succeed or fail based on their ability to host science and discovery.
Key threads
• Why labs break office economics
• Power, vibration, ventilation, and clustering
• The real meaning of “innovation districts”
Real estate lens
Laboratory real estate as urban infrastructure.
Series tie-back
Terraforming concentrates in cities — but only those built for it.
-
Core question
What have we actually established so far — and why does that make the next set of conversations unavoidable rather than optional?
Key ideas
• Phases 1 and 2 describe the system, not opinions
• Energy, land, materials, and compute act as hard constraints, not policy choices
• System collisions are not failures of ambition, but of mismatch between timelines and physics
• Once constraints collide, outcomes are shaped by decisions, not optimisationSeries tie-back
Everything up to this point explains how the physical system works.
Phase 3 is about how that system is steered — who allocates land, energy, capital, and risk when trade-offs can no longer be avoided.This reflection re-anchors the season before moving from description to consequence.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Cities are long-duration assets shaped by ownership, stewardship, and political choice.
Key threads
• Density vs liveability trade-offs
• Masterplanning limits vs organic growth
• Who benefits — and who is displaced
Real estate lens
Urban land as a social and economic allocation mechanism.
Series tie-back
Terraforming cities without clarity of purpose leads to fracture.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
Capital allocation determines what gets built — and what does not — over decades.
Key threads
• Infrastructure vs housing vs specialist real estate
• Political risk and duration
• What capital is quietly walking away from
Real estate lens
Ownership structures as future-shaping decisions.
Series tie-back
The future is allocated by capital, not imagined by architects. If you don't control the capital layer, you don't control the terraforming.
SYNTHESIS — TERRAFORMING THE REAL WORLD
Where broken systems are repurposed — without the luxury of starting again.
-
Guest: TBC
Core question
What breaks — and what we mis-build — if today’s models are scaled tenfold.
Key threads
• Where the system fails first
• Which land uses win and lose
• What future developers will regret
Real estate lens
Real estate as the final integrator of all system pressures.
Series close
Terraforming the real world means moving beyond 'prop-tech' and 'innovation' talk to the brutal reality of industrial delivery and sovereign-scale trade-offs.
Season 1 shows what must be built. Season 2 asks who gets to decide.